Monthly ArchivesSubscribe to RSSTres Lola Eco ChicStyle & BeautyLIFEetcTravelFood & HealthCareer


Weekly Words [oh-two-oh-two-twenty-ten]

| Subscribe Email Kate   bloglovin  

I'm on my second day of 4:45am wake up calls. This is because I've not yet moved into my new, much closer to college campus, apartment. This means that my daily commute is quite a long journey. I think if this sort of day continues I'm going to have to start taking Nanna naps at about 2pm. The upside to long train journeys is that I have a lot of time to read and write. However, rather than inducing enviable productivity, the morning journey occurs pre-caffeination and thus results in live-tweeting as I read The Australian, rather than clever analysis or comment for my blogs.

This week on Tres Lola I'll be talking about celebrating the 80's, beating the back to work/school blues and body image (which I also touched on a few weeks back in this article about naked and unretouched Jennifer Hawkins). In yesterdays Australian Daily Telegraph, it was reported that Australian women have the highest rising obesity rate. Which got me to thinking, why is this the case? A male commenter touched on what is probably quite a likely contributing mindset to increasing weight gain amongst women when he said "Food is fuel, it isn't recreation, eat when you're hungry, not bored ".

Earlier this week I noticed a tweet from Natalie about the fat acceptance movement and the lack of media coverage it receives (at least, here in Australia). When asking her whether she believed a movement of this sort really deserved greater media attention, she replied that she didn't believe any person deserved to be demonised based on their body type. And I agree with this sentiment whole-heartedly. I know I could never consider judging the worth of a person based upon what size pants they wear.


In saying that, on a personal level, I think that we place too much of a link between our body image or size and our self worth. But when it comes to 'fat acceptance', comfort in ones own skin can be a positive, but I must err on the side of health. We must also acknowledge that being underweight can be just as damaging as being overweight. The only questions I pose when considering my weight are: am I healthy (ie. how is my energy, have I been poorly a lot lately?) and do I feel good about me? If I can answer both of those questions with a yes, that is good enough for me. There will be more on this on Tres Lola this Thursday.

Onwards to contentious topic #2: Late last week I attended a talk by radical British climate sceptic, Christopher Monckton. I wrote an article about his presentation that you can read here. You may know, my hometown is Newcastle, Australia. Newcastle is the worlds largest coal exporter. While this is most certainly not a feat to boast of, it gives some context as to the sort of receptive crowd (consisting largely of people around my grandparents age group) Monckton met with when he addressed Newcastle. To hear so many allowing fear of a loss of traditional industry in Newcastle result in mockery of climate science, and those who lobby in favour of it, was disheartening. However, as I write this on my train journey back to Newcastle, I can over hear a mother explaining wind power to her young son, my faith is renewed and the enviro-activist in me is encouraged.

Whichever side of the climate argument you find yourself on, surely both sides can come together to agree that a move towards sustainable energy is positive for the new jobs it will create and the economic prosperity it will bring about. If we want to operate a capitalist society, the least we can do is to capitalise on natural resources, such as wind and solar rather than coal, in a way that will ensure that not only us lot in the United States, Britain and Australia are enjoying all the luxuries our industrialised societies afford us, but that we give developing nations such as Bangladesh and island nations like the Maldives a fair go too. And, if, a time comes where all the incredibly learned climate scientists and economists are proven to have miscalculated the effect of our carbon emissions on the environment, we will still have developed a new industry to bolster our economies, provide jobs for our families and ensure that even after we have exhausted our oil and coal reserves, we can still enjoy our lifestyles.


What are your thoughts? What's going on in your world this week?

Labels: , ,



4 Comments:

At 2 February 2010 at 19:41 , Anonymous Fiona said...

I can't do the fat acceptance thing. Maybe I'm shallow? Or maybe I just don't believe that just because the average Australian woman is size 14-16 and rising that we should be happy at that size!

 
At 3 February 2010 at 00:51 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow I wouldn't have thought Australia had the highest obesity rate. We're always getting how fat we are crammed down our throats in America. People seem to forget health reasons for being certain weights, only focusing on what's deemed beautiful. I'm glad you're talking about it here. I can't wait to read more.

Did you hear about Glamour Magazine's pledge to start using "plus size" models? Here are a few links if not:
http://www.glamour.com/health-fitness/blogs/vitamin-g/2009/09/on-the-cl-are-you-ready-to-sta.html

http://www.glamour.com/health-fitness/blogs/vitamin-g/2009/09/on-the-cl-are-you-ready-to-sta.html

That was in August. Since then, sure I've seen one "bigger" model in each issue, but not without really looking for her. Why can't we just put real women in the magazines they read? Why is weight such a massive obsession worldwide?

 
At 3 February 2010 at 11:19 , Anonymous Kate said...

Fiona I don't think that's being shallow Fiona, I find it hard to swallow sometimes too. Like I get that Jennifer Hudson, Kate Winslet, Nigella Lawson etc are curvy & gorgeous (I'd kill for Winslet's shape!) ... but can Beth Ditto also be called curvy? Where is the line in the sand?


Superalzy I'd have to check, but I believe the US still has the highest obesity rate in the world - but Australia is fast catching up. Whatever the case, I think that the focus on our bodies really does have to stop being about what's beautiful and start being primarily about what is healthy - greater support from fashion & women's magazines would be a start. I think you touch on an important point when you say that since Glamour's commitment, it's been difficult to note change. I've noticed that with many publications. It makes you ponder whether it's all rhetoric. I think a perfect way to bolster greater body-image would be to consider using a mix of sizes on the fashion pages. Those pages are where many women focus their attention, they need to know that what is there is for them, not just the really slim girls.

 
At 3 February 2010 at 17:41 , Blogger Unknown said...

I am onboard with Fiona. I think it is unhealthy to encourage a fat movement. It really annoys me when people call obesity curves. Let's not ignore the issue here. It also goes both ways. There is a line between natuarally thin and eating disorder, lets not sugar coat it. Both obese and underweight people have a problem if not a disease.


But I am more interested in the Energy Issue this week...



While I am not breaking any new ground here ... I can't help but state the obvious - that moving from coal to wind power is not going to be easy.

I currently live in a mining town and work on site. The community is small but bustling. Many small independent businesses are able to flourish because of the mine and the benefits that are provided to many community members including indigenous people, schools, sporting teams, graduates, single parents and people returning to the work force are un-replicable (is that a word?) in other industries.

While I am not working in the coal industry (I am working with Uranium), I can understand the very real fear many people have. And to play the devils advocate, I feel that labelling their fears as ignorant or anything similar to that is completely hypocritical. (Not that anyone has done so yet ... but just in case you were thinking it :) ) I don't have the numbers but when you consider the jobs involved indirectly from the Coal industry, the number of new jobs that wind energy will create does seem to loose it's shine. For example, I can think of 2 large groups that would be hugely impacted by a move away from coal.

Trucking and Rail Companies - The drivers, operators, administrators, stores persons, qa's, trades assistants, mechanics, accounts, receptionists ..
The effect of these jobs disappearing would then affect those who work for National rail companies. If their business was big enough then it would affect outsourced administration, accounts and customer service jobs.

Import and Export both Shipping and by Air - The same as above.

Wind energy will not require the movement of product any where near the amount of coal.

Now put yourself - for example - in the baby boomers mind from the mining areas in/near Newcastle. They know that these are finite resources, that millions of jobs rely on the industry. The current global economy is pretty rubbish and the industry has been less than solid over the past decade. The one thing they know is that this job has been able to provide continues training and skill development, housing assistance if in a remote area, childcare assistance, education programs and sponsorship for local clubs and sporting teams, promotion, education, training and employment strategies that are available for the indigenous community . Now you are telling them that climate change demands that we give up coal and switch. Wouldn't you be terrified. It is a lot to loose.

Please do not think for an instant that I do not believe that we need to invest heavily in green energy, however, after working on a mine site and seeing how such a small community can be so hugely affected, it gave me the opportunity to take a step back and have a look at the other 'side'.

And just for an added titbit - No company that I have worked for or with previously has put such a huge emphasis on environment and community. I have never had so much on the job training about the area I work in, the original land owners, the environmental expectations of individual workers and visibility into regeneration plans and contracts.

The mining of our natural resources is far from being without fault. But I do think it is a case of seeing it firsthand before making a judgement call.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home



Kate is the 23 year old Australian web editor behind treslola.com (and tresviva.com). After 3 years of living and working in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, Kate has returned to Sydney to study journalism. Her adoration runs deep for London, dumplings, bubble tea, David Tennant, John Barrowman, How I Met Your Mother, Peaches, travel, progressive activism and writing. Learn more about Kate and treslola.com here.

Lijit Search



Have the latest articles delivered straight to your inbox - simply enter your email address below...





Skype Me™!








Mademoiselle Robot, reLYME, Super Kawaii Mama, Annie Spandex, Yes and Yes, Fashion Hayley, Dramatis Personae, Nubby Twiglet, Frock & Roll, Aimee Marie, Doe Deere, Dressed Up Like A Lady, Free Bird: Queen Gilda, The Coveted, Pony and Pink, Karla's Closet, Already Pretty, Sparkle & Glitter, Scribbles, Lick my Cupcakes, Cinnamon and Coffee, Miss Morgan Potts, Lady Smaggle, Mermaid In A Manhole, Lady Melbourne, Gin In A Tea Cup, Wish Wish Wish, A Cat of Impossible Colour, ArtHaus, Nay Sayers Speak, The Glamorous Grad Student, Girl With A Satchel, Mama Mia, Sassi Sam, Sarah Wilson, Chris Brogan




bloglovin

Tres Lola at Blogged



ABOUT MONTHLY ARCHIVES CONTACT CC 2008-10